Headlines
SC reserves order on government plea on Rafale documents
New Delhi, March 14
The Supreme Court on Thursday received its order on the government's plea claiming privilege over the documents filed by petitioners - former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, journalist-turned-politician Arun Shourie and activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan - in connection with the Rafale case.
After an hour-long hearing, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the order on the plea which also sought removal of the documents from the case records.
The Centre had on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the petitioners, who were seeking a review of the court's December 14 judgement giving a clean chit to the government in the Rafale deal, are guilty of leakage of sensitive information having a bearing on national security and combat capacity of the fighter jets.
In an affidavit, the government said the leaked information was now available to the "enemy/our adversaries", adding those who have conspired in this leakage were guilty of penal offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
The Centre had contended that the documents which were unauthorisedly photocopied belonged to a class for which it was "entitled to claim privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."
Asserting that the petitioners had "no authority" to produce the documents before the court without its "explicit permission", the affidavit says that these documents are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.
After an hour-long hearing, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the order on the plea which also sought removal of the documents from the case records.
The Centre had on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the petitioners, who were seeking a review of the court's December 14 judgement giving a clean chit to the government in the Rafale deal, are guilty of leakage of sensitive information having a bearing on national security and combat capacity of the fighter jets.
In an affidavit, the government said the leaked information was now available to the "enemy/our adversaries", adding those who have conspired in this leakage were guilty of penal offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
The Centre had contended that the documents which were unauthorisedly photocopied belonged to a class for which it was "entitled to claim privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."
Asserting that the petitioners had "no authority" to produce the documents before the court without its "explicit permission", the affidavit says that these documents are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.

1 hour ago
South Korea confirms plan for OPCON transfer from US within Lee's 5-year term

1 hour ago
Khalistani elements raise funds under guise of charity, use it for extremist causes: Report

2 hours ago
‘Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid’ star Robert Redford passes at the age of 89

3 hours ago
'Most degenerate newspaper': Trump slaps $15 billion defamation suit on New York Times

4 hours ago
US to begin applying tariff on Japanese automakers, Korean cars subject to 25 pc levy

6 hours ago
A Vibrant Tapestry of Joy: Bloomington’s Festival of Joy 2025 Unites Hearts in Celebration

6 hours ago
Zeenat Aman: I never found myself to be beautiful

6 hours ago
Jackie Shroff highlights traffic frustration as ambulance gets stuck, appeals for smarter driving

6 hours ago
Rukmini Vasanth wraps up dubbing for 'Kantara: Chapter 1'

6 hours ago
Paris Hilton: I have an entire room in my house for sunglasses

6 hours ago
Here’s how Kajol shows an outfit can outshine a compliment

7 hours ago
Meghalaya reshuffle: Sangma cabinet set to get 8 new faces today

7 hours ago
GST reforms to significantly benefit state discoms: Report