Headlines
SC reserves order on government plea on Rafale documents
New Delhi, March 14
The Supreme Court on Thursday received its order on the government's plea claiming privilege over the documents filed by petitioners - former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, journalist-turned-politician Arun Shourie and activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan - in connection with the Rafale case.
After an hour-long hearing, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the order on the plea which also sought removal of the documents from the case records.
The Centre had on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the petitioners, who were seeking a review of the court's December 14 judgement giving a clean chit to the government in the Rafale deal, are guilty of leakage of sensitive information having a bearing on national security and combat capacity of the fighter jets.
In an affidavit, the government said the leaked information was now available to the "enemy/our adversaries", adding those who have conspired in this leakage were guilty of penal offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
The Centre had contended that the documents which were unauthorisedly photocopied belonged to a class for which it was "entitled to claim privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."
Asserting that the petitioners had "no authority" to produce the documents before the court without its "explicit permission", the affidavit says that these documents are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.
After an hour-long hearing, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the order on the plea which also sought removal of the documents from the case records.
The Centre had on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the petitioners, who were seeking a review of the court's December 14 judgement giving a clean chit to the government in the Rafale deal, are guilty of leakage of sensitive information having a bearing on national security and combat capacity of the fighter jets.
In an affidavit, the government said the leaked information was now available to the "enemy/our adversaries", adding those who have conspired in this leakage were guilty of penal offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
The Centre had contended that the documents which were unauthorisedly photocopied belonged to a class for which it was "entitled to claim privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."
Asserting that the petitioners had "no authority" to produce the documents before the court without its "explicit permission", the affidavit says that these documents are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.
11 hours ago
"Very important relationship": Trump on swearing-in of Sergio Gor as US Ambassador to India
11 hours ago
Kiran Desai loses out to Hungarian-British author for Booker Prize
11 hours ago
Indian envoy congratulates Sergio Gor on being sworn in as US Ambassador to India
14 hours ago
Cryptocurrency playing key role in drawing Trump closer to Pakistan: Report
14 hours ago
EAM Jaishankar travels to Canada for G7 Foreign Ministers' meeting
17 hours ago
NIA takes over Delhi blast case
19 hours ago
Allu Arjun says 'I wish for peace to prevail once again' after the horrific Delhi blast
19 hours ago
Hema Malini expresses anger over false reports of Dharmendra's demise: 'What is happening is unforgivable'
19 hours ago
SRK, Aryan Khan pay visit to Dharmendra in hospital
19 hours ago
Canada offers condolences over deadly Red Fort blast in Delhi
19 hours ago
Delhi blast: Family members of Kashmiri doctors say they had no inkling of terror involvement
19 hours ago
Team of 500 officials formed to investigate Delhi blast
19 hours ago
Delhi blast: Probe finds Dr Umar from Pulwama was driving suspect car
