Technology
Bezos slammed for his plans for regulating face recognition
Seattle, Sep 27
Civil rights groups have criticised Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos for a statement that his company is working on its own regulation framework for the controversial facial recognition technology.
Appearing before the media at his company's annual product event where it launched a slew of new smart home devices, Bezos said: "Our public policy team is actually working on facial recognition regulations; it makes a lot of sense to regulate that.
"It's a perfect example of something that has really positive uses, so you don't want to put the brakes on it," added Bezos, according to Recode.
"But, at the same time, there's also potential for abuses of that kind of technology, so you do want regulations. It's a classic dual-use kind of technology," he told the reporters.
The announcement to write own regulations for the face recognition technology which been in the controversy for long did not go well with the activist groups.
"Amazon wants to write the laws governing facial recognition to make sure they're friendly to their surveillance-driven business model," Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, was quoted as saying in a Fox News report.
"This type of technology is uniquely dangerous. It poses a profound threat to the future of human liberty that can't be mitigated by industry-friendly regulations," he added.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the tech giant needs to do more than propose a legislation.
"If Amazon is really interested in preventing these dangers, the first thing it should do is stop pushing surveillance tools into our communities without regard for the impact," the ACLU's senior legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani said in a statement.
Amazon isn't the only tech company calling for regulating the facial recognition technology.
Microsoft and its President Brad Smith are also urging governments to enact legislation regarding the technology.
The tech industry needs to step up and do more to address challenges related to regulation, said Smith in his new book titled "Tools and Weapons".
Given the potential for abuse of the fast advancing facial recognition technology, governments across the world need to start adopting laws to regulate this technology in 2019, Smith said last year.
"Unless we act, we risk waking up five years from now to find that facial recognition services have spread in ways that exacerbate societal issues," warned Smith in a blog post.
"The use of facial recognition technology by a government for mass surveillance can encroach on democratic freedoms," he said in December last year.
Amazon has also defended the face recognition.
New technology should not be banned or condemned because of its potential misuse. Instead, there should be open, honest, and earnest dialogue among all parties involved to ensure that the technology is applied appropriately and is continuously enhanced," the company said in a February blog post.
Amazon offers "Rekognition" -- a facial recognition tool that has been used to spot criminals.
In August, the ACLU found that "Rekognition" tool wrongly flagged more than two dozen California lawmakers as criminal. In another test last year, it marked 28 members of Congress as criminals.
Appearing before the media at his company's annual product event where it launched a slew of new smart home devices, Bezos said: "Our public policy team is actually working on facial recognition regulations; it makes a lot of sense to regulate that.
"It's a perfect example of something that has really positive uses, so you don't want to put the brakes on it," added Bezos, according to Recode.
"But, at the same time, there's also potential for abuses of that kind of technology, so you do want regulations. It's a classic dual-use kind of technology," he told the reporters.
The announcement to write own regulations for the face recognition technology which been in the controversy for long did not go well with the activist groups.
"Amazon wants to write the laws governing facial recognition to make sure they're friendly to their surveillance-driven business model," Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, was quoted as saying in a Fox News report.
"This type of technology is uniquely dangerous. It poses a profound threat to the future of human liberty that can't be mitigated by industry-friendly regulations," he added.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the tech giant needs to do more than propose a legislation.
"If Amazon is really interested in preventing these dangers, the first thing it should do is stop pushing surveillance tools into our communities without regard for the impact," the ACLU's senior legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani said in a statement.
Amazon isn't the only tech company calling for regulating the facial recognition technology.
Microsoft and its President Brad Smith are also urging governments to enact legislation regarding the technology.
The tech industry needs to step up and do more to address challenges related to regulation, said Smith in his new book titled "Tools and Weapons".
Given the potential for abuse of the fast advancing facial recognition technology, governments across the world need to start adopting laws to regulate this technology in 2019, Smith said last year.
"Unless we act, we risk waking up five years from now to find that facial recognition services have spread in ways that exacerbate societal issues," warned Smith in a blog post.
"The use of facial recognition technology by a government for mass surveillance can encroach on democratic freedoms," he said in December last year.
Amazon has also defended the face recognition.
New technology should not be banned or condemned because of its potential misuse. Instead, there should be open, honest, and earnest dialogue among all parties involved to ensure that the technology is applied appropriately and is continuously enhanced," the company said in a February blog post.
Amazon offers "Rekognition" -- a facial recognition tool that has been used to spot criminals.
In August, the ACLU found that "Rekognition" tool wrongly flagged more than two dozen California lawmakers as criminal. In another test last year, it marked 28 members of Congress as criminals.

11 hours ago
Two sisters, one recipe; from grandmother’s culinary craft to a ₹10-crore brand.

11 hours ago
Rebel Foods achieves ₹1,000 crore in sales through the cloud kitchen model.

12 hours ago
"Prepare to be deported": Rubio Says visa revocations underway for foreigners celebrating Kirk's death

12 hours ago
Trump warns Europe to 'stop buying oil from Russia', asks Zelenskyy 'have to make a deal'

12 hours ago
Realism and caution must be adopted in efforts to add momentum to warming India-China ties: Report

12 hours ago
PM Modi, Denmark counterpart Frederiksen vow to strengthen Green Strategic Partnership

14 hours ago
South Korea confirms plan for OPCON transfer from US within Lee's 5-year term

14 hours ago
Khalistani elements raise funds under guise of charity, use it for extremist causes: Report

15 hours ago
‘Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid’ star Robert Redford passes at the age of 89

16 hours ago
'Most degenerate newspaper': Trump slaps $15 billion defamation suit on New York Times

16 hours ago
US to begin applying tariff on Japanese automakers, Korean cars subject to 25 pc levy

19 hours ago
A Vibrant Tapestry of Joy: Bloomington’s Festival of Joy 2025 Unites Hearts in Celebration

19 hours ago
Zeenat Aman: I never found myself to be beautiful