Sports
IOA raises objections to draft Sports Code
New Delhi, Nov 11
The Indian Olympic Association has raised several objections in its feedback to the draft of the National Code for Good Governance in Sports (NCGGS) 2017, chief among which were articles which they deemed as amounting to government interference in sports bodies autonomy.
It was also opposed to the proposal to restrict the age limit of the office-bearers of National Sports Federations (NSFs) to 70 years and the exclusion of state Olympic Associations from the IOA.
The IOA opposed the provision in the draft code that requires the government to nominate or appoint an Athletes' Commission. "The Indian Olympic Association is duty bound to protect the autonomy of sports organisations and opposes the provision in this Code for the Government to nominate/appoint Athletes Commission in the NOC/NSFs," it said.
It also raised a red flag over government interference in the provision that reserved a position for a government nominee in the board of the National Olympic Committee or an NSF. "Any position for a government nominee on the Board of the NOC/NSFs clearly amounts to government intervention in the autonomy of sports governance," it said.
It was argued in 2014 that the national sports code, which was formulated in 2011, was not updated as per the requirements of modern day sport. In 2017, on the direction of the Delhi High Court, the sports ministry reconstituted a panel that put out a revised code which is yet to be implemented.
It was also opposed to the proposal to restrict the age limit of the office-bearers of National Sports Federations (NSFs) to 70 years and the exclusion of state Olympic Associations from the IOA.
The IOA opposed the provision in the draft code that requires the government to nominate or appoint an Athletes' Commission. "The Indian Olympic Association is duty bound to protect the autonomy of sports organisations and opposes the provision in this Code for the Government to nominate/appoint Athletes Commission in the NOC/NSFs," it said.
It also raised a red flag over government interference in the provision that reserved a position for a government nominee in the board of the National Olympic Committee or an NSF. "Any position for a government nominee on the Board of the NOC/NSFs clearly amounts to government intervention in the autonomy of sports governance," it said.
It was argued in 2014 that the national sports code, which was formulated in 2011, was not updated as per the requirements of modern day sport. In 2017, on the direction of the Delhi High Court, the sports ministry reconstituted a panel that put out a revised code which is yet to be implemented.

5 hours ago
On UK trip, US President Trump highlights his ‘very good relationship’ with PM Modi

5 hours ago
Indian envoy to US meets senior Pentagon official, holds 'valuable discussion'

6 hours ago
Newark Airport ranks last once again; even the new Terminal A couldn’t save it.

8 hours ago
Trade deal with US to bolster India’s regional role: Report

10 hours ago
Trump administration unveils 'patriotic education' initiative as new priority for federal education grants

12 hours ago
Tucson City Council in Arizona to open with ancient Hindu prayers

13 hours ago
Did Deepika Padukone exit 'Kalki 2898 AD' due to commitment issues?

13 hours ago
Tannishtha Chatterjee wishes ‘incredible woman’ Shabana Azmi on 75th b’day

13 hours ago
Ananya Panday flaunts bronzed glow post her Maldivian holiday

13 hours ago
Divya Dutta to Shabana Azmi: You are supremely precious in my life

13 hours ago
Kerala a bridge between India and Europe: CM Vijayan on blue economy conclave

13 hours ago
Bengal student murder: Protest erupts at Birbhum school, headmaster thrashed

13 hours ago
India-US tariff stalemate likely to be resolved in 8-10 weeks: Chief Economic Advisor