Headlines
Court quashes Nagaland govt's order banning dog meat sale
Guwahati, June 7
A Nagaland government order prohibiting the sale and eating of dog meat in the state issued in 2020 was recently quashed by the Kohima Bench of the Gauhati High Court.
On June 2, Justice Marli Vankung ruled that the state government could not have prohibited the consumption of dog meat without a valid legal basis.
The Court order mentioned: "The prohibition of sale and consumption of dog meat, by the Executive branch of the Government, without there being any law passed by the legislation in relation to trade and consumption of dog meat is liable thus to be set aside even though the impugned notification dated July 4, 2020 is said to have been passed in accordance with a Cabinet decision."
The Court reasoned that there is no indication of any authority to issue prohibition orders in the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, which served as the foundation for the government's issuance of the order.
It also observed that dog meat was not covered by the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, though this was not 'surprising'.
"The meat of dogs is consumed only in some parts of the North Eastern states and the very idea of consuming dog meat is alien in other parts of the country. The thought of adding canine/dogs as an animal for human consumption under regulation 2.5.1(a) would be inconceivable, since consumption of dog meat would be considered unthinkable...
"The consumption of dog meat appears to be an accepted norm and food amongst the Nagas even in modern times, wherein the petitioners are able to earn their livelihood by transporting dogs and selling of dog meat," the court said.
The court emphasised that under long-standing precedent, the FSS Act's Commissioner of Food Safety -- not the State's Chief Secretary -- was the only person authorised to issue orders outlawing the sale of any meat within the state.
It was acknowledged that the management of the dogs intended for slaughter in the current situation was not entirely hygienic or in accordance with the Slaughter House Rules. The Court ruled that the same did not, however, support a blanket ban.
It stated that corrective actions can be done to enforce the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Indian Penal Code's provisions in order to resolve the issue of dogs suffering before they are put to death.
In November 2020, the High Court stayed the Nagaland government order that had banned import, trade and sale of dog meat in the state.
11 hours ago
Indian-Origin Lawyer Dismissed After Investigation into Relationship with CEO
11 hours ago
US Congress Approves Bill to Curb Chinese Influence on Campuses
11 hours ago
US and Lithuania Express Concern Over China's 'Provocative and Destabilizing Actions' in South China Sea
11 hours ago
NASA Astronaut Sunita Williams to Speak from International Space Station
12 hours ago
Putin: Strikes on Russian Territory with Western Weapons Would Mean US and Europe Are at War with Russia
12 hours ago
U.S. Department of State Announces EB-2 Visa Quota for Fiscal Year 2024 Fully Exhausted
13 hours ago
Indian researchers build low-cost solution to enhance engine performance
13 hours ago
Non-metro cities leading in orders on e-commerce platforms in India: Report
13 hours ago
Focussing on bacteria alone will not help combat deadly antimicrobial resistance: Lancet
13 hours ago
Asian Hockey Champions Trophy: India ready for high-voltage encounter against Pakistan
13 hours ago
Rashmika Mandanna jets off in style for Milan Fashion Week 2024
13 hours ago
Director Naga’s ‘Thalaivettiyaan Paalayam’ trailer weaves humour with heartwarming moments
13 hours ago
Rakul Preet shares her weekday hair evolution, gastronomic escapades