Filmworld
Censor board behaving like the Taliban: Filmmaker Vishal Bhardwaj
His unabashed use of abuses and rustic lingo in his films has always
added to the power of his cinema. National Award winning filmmaker
Vishal Bhardwaj has reacted strongly to diktats on film content, saying
that the Central Board of Film Certification is behaving like the
Taliban and that the body should be "chopped off".
In an
interview with IANS, the multi-talented Bhardwaj - a writer, singer,
composer, director and producer - spoke uninhibitedly about the curb on
filmmakers' creativity.
The debate on censorship guidelines has
been on for a long time, but it was a list of cuss words to be banned
from films - as suggested by the CBFC under filmmaker Pahlaj Nihalani's
chairmanship - that added fuel to the fire.
Bhardwaj says that
while Indian films are "moving towards international recognition", the
government should exercise a limit on the CBFC's power to curb the "art
form" that is cinema.
Excerpts from the interview:
Q: Do you feel that Indian cinema is getting recognised globally?
A:
Yes, we are really moving towards international recognition... We are
in the best of times at the moment. The line between commercial and
arthouse cinema has blurred. Today we have films like 'The Lunchbox' and
'Badlapur' doing such great business... we have audience for each and
every kind of film.
Q: But hasn't Bollywood become stereotypical in its scripts?
A:
The whole cinema should not be called stereotyped. Stories of films
like 'Badlapur' and 'Haider' are totally different and unique from what
we have seen till now. In fact, we are breaking the stereotype image of
our cinema.
But, if we talk about commercial cinema, that will remain stereotyped.
Q:
The Indian entertainment industry has been facing a backlash for its
content -- whether it's the AIB Roast, Aamir Khan's 'PK' controversy or
the CBFC's announcement regarding the words that should be omitted from
films. Don't you feel Indian filmmakers are being dominated?
A:
It's really sad what is happening right now. The Censor Board is
behaving like a Taliban. They should be censored and chopped. They
censor our films, they should be chopped first. They should know their
limits...it's (film is) an art form.
They should be restricted by
the government, and I hope that the Information and Broadcasting
Ministry realises soon that film is a form of art. They are not only
about 'gaana-bajaana' and 'nautanki'. That I&B ministry has to
understand...their (the censor's) scissors should be snatched away and
thrown into a valley.
Q. But don't abuses in films have a negative effect on the audience?
A.
Why? When you use an abuse on the road, won't that have a negative
effect on you? A film is the mirror of the reality and not vice versa. A
film doesn't create reality, it just reflects reality.
Either
the government makes a rule that people shouldn't abuse on road. Then we
will feel that the government wants to change the character of the
nation. If the government really wants to make a change, then they
should consider abusing behind the camera as a crime too. The society
should change, not films, because filmmakers only show what all is
happening in the society.
If we make a film on Kabir (poet), will
people start speaking couplets on the road? If not, then how will they
start abusing after watching films?
We have a culture and society
where people abuse on roads...we have a style...when two friends meet,
even they abuse each other...So now, are we going to make an Afghanistan
out of India, or what (with the Censor Board's diktats)?
(Sandeep Sharma can be contacted at [email protected])