Articles features
India must be wary of Tamil extremism in Sri Lanka
By
By M.R. Narayan SwamyAs Prime Minister Narendra Modi begins to build a relationship with Sri
Lanka's new leadership, the one thing he needs to be wary of is the
extremist Tamil position in the island nation.
Modi made history
by becoming the first Indian prime minister to visit Sri Lanka after
1987 when Rajiv Gandhi went to Colombo to sign a pact to end Tamil
separatism, which eventually consumed his life in 1991.
Modi won
many hearts by becoming the first Indian leader to visit Jaffna, the
Tamil heartland which is also the hub for the Northern Provincial
Council (NPC) headed by Chief Minister C.V. Wigneswaran.
This is where Modi came across an intransigent Wigneswaran.
This
is a critical time for Sri Lanka, which is trying, not successfully
though, to overcome decades of ethnic strife that has split the island
dominantly between the Sinhalese, the majority community, and the
Tamils.
The end of the military conflict in May 2009 led to
boisterous Sinhalese frenzy and a defeated Tamil psyche as the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) was crushed.
Further
strains were introduced when Mahinda Rajapaksa, after losing the
presidential election in January this year, blamed the West and -
specifically - India for his defeat at the hands of Maithripala
Sirisena.
The presidential election outcome was itself a close
affair, showing that Rajapaksa still has wide support in Sinhalese
areas. Since then, he has been attracting massive crowds at public
meetings.
It was at such a sensitive juncture that the NPC,
overseen by Wigneswaran, passed a resolution in February, just before
Sirisena landed in India on his first trip abroad, accusing successive
Sri Lankan governments of committing "genocide" against the Tamils.
It
went on to say that Tamils have no hope for justice in any Sri Lankan
mechanism, whether conducted by the Rajapaksa or Sirisena or any regime,
and sought international intervention.
Needless to say, the move
hugely embarrassed India. It was also just what Rajapaksa needed to
show his Sinhalese constituency that Sirisena's election had emboldened
extremist Tamils.
If this wan't enough, Wigneswaran, at the
Jaffna meeting where he received Modi, called for talks between the Sri
Lankan and Indian governments as well as the Northern and Eastern
Provincial Councils to resolve Tamil issues "in an innovative and
creative manner".
This is akin to the Hurriyat seeking to involve India, Pakistan and itself over Jammu and Kashmir.
Wigneswaran's
demand in Modi's presence came shortly after the Indian prime minister
had met leaders of the Tamil National Alliance, the party to which the
chief minister too belongs, and called for patience.
It is
surprising that Wigneswaran sought to bypass his own party by demanding
direct talks between his provincial council as well as Colombo and New
Delhi.
Indeed, after the NPC resolution on "genocide", friends of
India in Sri Lanka suggested that it would be best if Modi avoided a
public engagement involving Wigneswaran in Colombo or Jaffna.
The
argument was that Wigneswaran seemed to be acting at the behest of the
pro-LTTE Tamil Diaspora in the West and his words and actions could only
show Tamils as extremists - and fuel appropriate Sinhalese backlash.
This is the last thing that India - and Modi - need now.
As
India tries to help join the disjointed Sri Lanka jigsaw, which by
itself is no easy task, it has to be borne in mind that Tamil extremism
is essentially anti-Indian. It has always been so and will always be so.
India
must be wary of being seen to be supportive of extremists - of any kind
in Sri Lanka. It is no surprise that Wigneswaran gets the loudest
cheers from Tamils in the West opposed to any reconciliation in Sri
Lanka.
(M.R. Narayan Swamy is a long-time Sri Lanka watcher. The
views expressed are personal. He can be reached on
[email protected])