Articles features
Politicising the military: A strategic blunder
By
By Admiral Arun Prakash (retd) India's armed forces, apart from their role of safeguarding the nation,
provide a bright strand in the national fabric, which represents the
ideals of integrity, discipline, secularism and professional excellence.
Since
independence, they have embodied a proud pan-Indian martial tradition
that promotes a sense of national unity and cohesion. In a region full
of praetorian militaries, the Indian armed forces have remained
scrupulously apolitical and a staunch pillar of democracy. Above all,
they have come to the rescue when all other agencies have failed the
Indian state.
Like those who take up government service or
political office, the serviceman, too, swears an oath to the
constitution of India. But, unlike them, the soldier bears an 'unlimited
liability' for defence of the nation. His oath of allegiance includes
this commitment: "I will obey all commands of the president of India
.....even to the peril of my life." It is for this reason that the
soldier is given a special place in society.
However, this year's
Kargil Vijay Diwas, meant to celebrate the victory of Indian armed
forces over Pakistani intruders and to honour those who fell in battle,
left a bitter taste in every soldier's mouth. While politicians paid
saccharine tributes to our fallen Kargil heroes, veterans - many in
their 80s - were into the fifth week of a public agitation, asking the
NDA government to redeem its promise of granting 'one rank one pension'
or OROP.
It was government inaction on the 6th Pay Commission
anomalies that first drove the veterans on the streets in 2008.
Political indifference was compounded by the hostile approach of MoD
(ministry of defence) bureaucracy in handling problems related to
pensions and allowances of aging veterans, war widows and battle
casualties. Forced to go to the courts, they were stunned to find a
litigious MoD fighting them at every step through appeals. In a bizarre
development, the MoD perversely refused to implement even Supreme Court
judgments favourable to the veterans. This was what eventually forced a
disciplined and politically-neutral segment of society into the maw of
party-politics.
In the run-up to the 2014 elections, dismayed by
the traditionally disdainful attitude of the Congress, the veterans
allowed themselves to be lured by the BJP's putative nationalist stance.
Jumping on the party's bandwagon seemed like a sure way of getting
their demands met. The post-election allocation of cabinet portfolios to
freshly retired military officers - a move of questionable wisdom -
seemed to bear out the veterans' optimism. A year later, however, the
disillusioned veterans are seeking alternative political options.
Once
he doffs his uniform, a veteran is, technically, liberated from the
restraints of military discipline and is free to adopt the demeanor of
an ordinary civilian. But deep inside, his soul cringes at the very
thought of conducting himself in a manner which would have brought
disrepute to his uniform, unit or Service. Public agitations and
undertaking fasts and dharnas are activities he instinctively associates
with trade unionism. They are the antithesis of military discipline and
fortitude; a creed he has followed for a lifetime. Similarly, he
harbours distaste for political horse-trading. Unfortunately,
misrepresentations and prevarication, by successive governments, on the
issue of OROP have driven our Veterans to adopt this approach.
It
seems incredible that none of the wise-heads amongst India's political
leadership has taken cognizance of two stark realities. Firstly: that
veterans retain a strong umbilical connection with serving personnel
because the two constitute an extended family. Whatever happens at
Jantar Mantar is flashed across to the men in uniform, almost instantly,
through print, electronic and social media. Secondly: anything that
humiliates the veteran also hurts the self-esteem of the soldier -
because he is tomorrow's veteran.
And yet, in an inexplicable and
self-destructive continuum, governments have deliberately proceeded to
downgrade and demoralize their own armed forces and veterans. This
insidious process, orchestrated by the bureaucracy, has employed the
instrumentality of successive pay commissions to whittle down the
financial and protocol status of the military while bolstering their
own. Politicians have allowed themselves to be persuaded that the key to
'civilian control' of the military lies in equating it with the police
and paramilitary forces and making it subservient to the bureaucracy.
A
savvy political leadership should have seen through this ploy and
realized that: (a) soldiers and veterans are emblematic of a nation's
pride and honour and need to be protected from such internal assaults,
(b) demoralization of the military erodes national security and benefits
the nation's enemies, and (c) allowing politicization of the military
is a strategic blunder that will have long-term consequences.
It
is appalling to think that, from 2008 onwards, no political leader has
had the good sense to visualize the damage that would be caused to
India's security edifice by veterans taking to the streets and seeking
political support. All this could have been nipped in the bud, very
simply, by reaching out to the veterans, creating grievance redressal
mechanisms and establishing direct communication with them. By egregious
neglect and inaction, politicians themselves have helped destroy the
apolitical ethos of our military, which the nation has been so proud of.
Irresponsible
and intemperate voices of the veterans are already being heard on the
social media; some demanding that the three service chiefs should offer
their resignations over the OROP issue. Worse suggestions may follow.
Even
at this late hour, a spark of statesmanship, sagacity and empathy for
the Indian soldier can pull us back from the precipice. Recognition of
the sacrifices made in fulfilling the extraordinary demands of military
service, articulated at the apex political level, and earliest accord of
OROP would justify a quid-pro-quo demand for cessation of the veterans'
agitation and their participation in politics.
(01.08.2015 -
Admiral Arun Prakash (retd) is a former Indian Navy chief. The views
expressed are personal. He can be contacted at [email protected])