Articles features
Hindu religion or culture was never under attack during Muslim rule in India: Book
Washington, Sep 11
At a time when religious
discourse is coming under friction, a new book by a Stanford University
historian has revealed a cultural alliance between Muslims and Hindus in
early Sanskrit texts, a finding that may help ease relationships
between the two religion's followers.
Titled Culture of
Encounters: Sanskrit at the Mughal Court, the book by Audrey Truschke, a
leading scholar of South Asian cultural and intellectual history,
argues that the heyday of Muslim rule in India from the 16th to 18th
centuries was, in fact, one of "tremendous cross-cultural respect and
fertilisation and not religious or cultural conflict."
Popular
thought in India holds that the origin of this conflict goes back
centuries to medieval times, when Muslim rule expanded into the Indian
subcontinent.
In her study of Sanskrit and Persian accounts of
life under the Mughal empire, the author provides the first detailed
account of India's religious intellectuals during this period.
“Her
research paints a far different picture than common perceptions, which
assume that the Muslim presence has always been hostile to Indian
languages, religions and culture,†the Stanford University said in a
statement.
According to Truschke, the divisive interpretation actually developed during the colonial period from 1757 to 1947.
“The
British benefited from pitting Hindus and Muslims against one another
and portrayed themselves as neutral saviours who could keep ancient
religious conflicts at bay," she writes.
"While colonialism
ended in the 1940s, the modern Hindu right has found tremendous
political value in continuing to proclaim and create endemic
Hindu-Muslim conflict,†she continues.
According to Truschke, a
Mellon postdoctoral fellow in the department of religious studies, her
research shows that much of the current religious conflict in India has
been fuelled by ideological assumptions about the Mughal period rather
than an accurate rendering of the subcontinent's history.
She
argues that the ideology underpinning such violence erroneously “erases
Mughal history and writes religious conflict into Indian history where
there was none, thereby fuelling and justifying modern religious
intoleranceâ€.
Her work shows that the Muslim impulse in India was not aimed at dominating Indian culture or Hinduism.
Early
modern-era Muslims were in fact "deeply interested in traditional
Indian learning, which is largely housed in Sanskrit," says Truschke,
who is teaching religion courses at Stanford.
For several months
in Pakistan and 10 months in India, Truschke travelled to more than two
dozen archives in search of manuscripts.
She was able to analyse the Mughal elite's diverse interactions with Sanskrit intellectuals in a way not previously done.
Truschke
found that high-level contact between learned Muslims and Hindus was
marked by collaborative encounters across linguistic and religious
lines.
The research overturns the assumption that the Mughals were hostile to traditional Indian literature or knowledge systems.
In fact, the findings reveal how Mughals supported and engaged with Indian thinkers and ideas.
She
hopes her findings "will provide a solid historiographical basis for
intervention in modern, political rewritings of the Indian past."
Truschke is currently working on her next book, a broader study of Sanskrit histories of Islamic dynasties in India.